<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dorothy Thompson: Not Alexander:an inscription from Hello!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.currentepigraphy.org/2008/02/19/dorothy-thompson-not-alexanderan-inscription-from-hello/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.currentepigraphy.org/2008/02/19/dorothy-thompson-not-alexanderan-inscription-from-hello/</link>
	<description>ISSN 1754-0909 (Online)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 10:45:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: N.S.</title>
		<link>http://www.currentepigraphy.org/2008/02/19/dorothy-thompson-not-alexanderan-inscription-from-hello/comment-page-1/#comment-3432</link>
		<dc:creator>N.S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.currentepigraphy.org/2008/02/19/dorothy-thompson-not-alexanderan-inscription-from-hello/#comment-3432</guid>
		<description>Two years ago I saw two photographs (not very clear) of these inscriptions somewhere on the Internet. Both inscriptions were connected to Emperor Trajan. The first one appeared to be an honorary inscription - an aorist passive participle of timao (timethe--) was clearly seen on the penultimate line, and before it, there were such words as epitrop[ou], strate[gou], and [ep]archou. The name of Trajan was clearly seen on the last line - [Ner]oua Traianou Sebastou, probably indicating the date of the inscription. The second inscription was obviously from a building: &quot;[Hyper Autokratoros Kaisaros] Neroua Traia[nou Sebastou Germanikou Da]kikou kai to[u sympantos oikou autou tyches? k]ai aioniou d[iamones ---].........[------] anoikodom[e- ---]E epi Serouio[u Soulpikiou Simileos eparchou Aigyptou I]oulia Artem[i- ---]&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two years ago I saw two photographs (not very clear) of these inscriptions somewhere on the Internet. Both inscriptions were connected to Emperor Trajan. The first one appeared to be an honorary inscription &#8211; an aorist passive participle of timao (timethe&#8211;) was clearly seen on the penultimate line, and before it, there were such words as epitrop[ou], strate[gou], and [ep]archou. The name of Trajan was clearly seen on the last line &#8211; [Ner]oua Traianou Sebastou, probably indicating the date of the inscription. The second inscription was obviously from a building: &#8220;[Hyper Autokratoros Kaisaros] Neroua Traia[nou Sebastou Germanikou Da]kikou kai to[u sympantos oikou autou tyches? k]ai aioniou d[iamones ---]&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;[------] anoikodom[e- ---]E epi Serouio[u Soulpikiou Simileos eparchou Aigyptou I]oulia Artem[i- ---]&#8220;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paschalis Paschidis</title>
		<link>http://www.currentepigraphy.org/2008/02/19/dorothy-thompson-not-alexanderan-inscription-from-hello/comment-page-1/#comment-3406</link>
		<dc:creator>Paschalis Paschidis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.currentepigraphy.org/2008/02/19/dorothy-thompson-not-alexanderan-inscription-from-hello/#comment-3406</guid>
		<description>Let me add that Souvaltzi&#039;s &quot;readings&quot; were also refuted, already by February 1995, by an official delegation of the Greek Ministry of Culture which investigated the site. I think there was no official publication, probably because Souvaltzi refused to show them all the fragments, but some details are reported &lt;a href=&quot;http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=990CE4D6103BF935A35751C0A963958260&amp;scp=1&amp;sq=souvaltzi&amp;st=nyt&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me add that Souvaltzi&#8217;s &#8220;readings&#8221; were also refuted, already by February 1995, by an official delegation of the Greek Ministry of Culture which investigated the site. I think there was no official publication, probably because Souvaltzi refused to show them all the fragments, but some details are reported <a href="http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=990CE4D6103BF935A35751C0A963958260&amp;scp=1&amp;sq=souvaltzi&amp;st=nyt" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

