Comments on: Epigraphic Digitization and Imagery Annotation http://www.currentepigraphy.org/2008/02/22/epigraphic-digitization-and-imagery-annotation/ ISSN 1754-0909 (Online) Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:36:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.10 by: Tom Elliott http://www.currentepigraphy.org/2008/02/22/epigraphic-digitization-and-imagery-annotation/#comment-3506 Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:28:15 +0000 http://www.currentepigraphy.org/2008/02/22/epigraphic-digitization-and-imagery-annotation/#comment-3506 Although Sean and I don't have bandwidth or funding to do more work on the InscriptOL demo at this time, we have licensed the code and made the Mercurial repository accessible so others can pick it up and run with it if they're so inclined. See further: http://zcologia.com/news/694/inscriptol-source/ Although Sean and I don’t have bandwidth or funding to do more work on the InscriptOL demo at this time, we have licensed the code and made the Mercurial repository accessible so others can pick it up and run with it if they’re so inclined. See further: http://zcologia.com/news/694/inscriptol-source/

]]> by: Melissa Terras http://www.currentepigraphy.org/2008/02/22/epigraphic-digitization-and-imagery-annotation/#comment-3443 Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:26:53 +0000 http://www.currentepigraphy.org/2008/02/22/epigraphic-digitization-and-imagery-annotation/#comment-3443 Well.... many folks working on inscriptions and handwritten texts draw, or trace, their own letter forms over an image of the text, to produce both an interpretation and be able to extract those letter forms to build up an overview of letter forms and hands. If they are doing it anyway, whats not to like about doing it electronically? That way, the resulting captured letter forms can easily be reproduced, repurposed, and used in further analysis, through various image manipulation, image processing, and AI techniques. If you are looking at digital images on screen, wouldnt it be nice to be able to annotate those images in the digital domain? and wouldnt it be even nicer to be able to *do something* with those annotations once you had captured them? howabout sharing your dataset with others (here - have my corpus of letter forms of Old Roman Cursive) - or use the data gathered from one document to aid in transcribing damaged and abraded text from another source which uses the same letter forms? There's no doubt it will be a lot of work to make a useful, and used, tool - but what larks.... Well…. many folks working on inscriptions and handwritten texts draw, or trace, their own letter forms over an image of the text, to produce both an interpretation and be able to extract those letter forms to build up an overview of letter forms and hands. If they are doing it anyway, whats not to like about doing it electronically? That way, the resulting captured letter forms can easily be reproduced, repurposed, and used in further analysis, through various image manipulation, image processing, and AI techniques.

If you are looking at digital images on screen, wouldnt it be nice to be able to annotate those images in the digital domain? and wouldnt it be even nicer to be able to *do something* with those annotations once you had captured them? howabout sharing your dataset with others (here - have my corpus of letter forms of Old Roman Cursive) - or use the data gathered from one document to aid in transcribing damaged and abraded text from another source which uses the same letter forms?

There’s no doubt it will be a lot of work to make a useful, and used, tool - but what larks….

]]>