<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Current Epigraphy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.currentepigraphy.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.currentepigraphy.org</link>
	<description>ISSN 1754-0909 (Online)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 10:45:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Epigraphy at AIA/APA 2012: CIL 9.2689=ILS 7478 by Cecilia Ricci</title>
		<link>http://www.currentepigraphy.org/2012/01/13/travelers-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-53408</link>
		<dc:creator>Cecilia Ricci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 10:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.currentepigraphy.org/?p=1094#comment-53408</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m absolutely of the same opinion! I work as Professor of Roman History and Latin Epigraphy by the University of Molise, and presenting a course on Aesernia in the second century, I had the opportunity to reflect on the cognomina of Calidius and Fannia and on the tone of the text, which can be: a inn sign , or an &#039;alternative&#039; burial inscription, perfectly in Samnite spirit, which we have other examples. Congratulations and courage!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m absolutely of the same opinion! I work as Professor of Roman History and Latin Epigraphy by the University of Molise, and presenting a course on Aesernia in the second century, I had the opportunity to reflect on the cognomina of Calidius and Fannia and on the tone of the text, which can be: a inn sign , or an &#8216;alternative&#8217; burial inscription, perfectly in Samnite spirit, which we have other examples. Congratulations and courage!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IG_SEG Concordance by Andrej Petrovic</title>
		<link>http://www.currentepigraphy.org/2010/07/12/ig_seg-concordance/comment-page-1/#comment-50394</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrej Petrovic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 12:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.currentepigraphy.org/2010/07/12/ig_seg-concordance/#comment-50394</guid>
		<description>Everything seems to be working fine to me, at least now (&amp; apologies for the delay).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everything seems to be working fine to me, at least now (&amp; apologies for the delay).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CIEGL 2012 Berlin, Newsletter &amp; CFP by Filippo Canali De Rossi</title>
		<link>http://www.currentepigraphy.org/2011/02/18/ciegl-newsletter/comment-page-1/#comment-50343</link>
		<dc:creator>Filippo Canali De Rossi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 18:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.currentepigraphy.org/?p=920#comment-50343</guid>
		<description>I add that in the final program (sent on 27.8.2012) a panel on &#039;Public Entertainment&#039; has been added that had not been previously advertised. I find it uncorrect as otherwise I would also have submitted a contibution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I add that in the final program (sent on 27.8.2012) a panel on &#8216;Public Entertainment&#8217; has been added that had not been previously advertised. I find it uncorrect as otherwise I would also have submitted a contibution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IG_SEG Concordance by Marco Perale</title>
		<link>http://www.currentepigraphy.org/2010/07/12/ig_seg-concordance/comment-page-1/#comment-50218</link>
		<dc:creator>Marco Perale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 22:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.currentepigraphy.org/2010/07/12/ig_seg-concordance/#comment-50218</guid>
		<description>Is the website down?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the website down?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Missing Dreros Inscription: Help Sought by Olga Tsangaraki</title>
		<link>http://www.currentepigraphy.org/2007/04/04/missing-dreros-inscription-help-sought/comment-page-1/#comment-49168</link>
		<dc:creator>Olga Tsangaraki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 11:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.currentepigraphy.org/2007/04/04/missing-dreros-inscription-help-sought/#comment-49168</guid>
		<description>I do not know if you are still looking for the law of Dreros but it is common knowelege here in Crete, that the block is in the Imperial Museum at Constantinople.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not know if you are still looking for the law of Dreros but it is common knowelege here in Crete, that the block is in the Imperial Museum at Constantinople.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some new inscriptions found in Rome by Martin G. Conde</title>
		<link>http://www.currentepigraphy.org/2011/01/19/some-new-inscriptions-found-in-rome/comment-page-1/#comment-46919</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin G. Conde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.currentepigraphy.org/?p=896#comment-46919</guid>
		<description>Dear Dott.ssa Orlandri, as for your comment: &quot;...but a little bit more discretion and patience while the official publication is still forthcoming,&quot; yes your right, but what surprised me the most about the news of the discovery or the inscriptions and other artifacts discovered at the site, and photographed between Jan. - Feb. 2011, I was surprised to learn from the scholars at the Museum of the Imperial Fora (e-mail personal communication in Feb. 2011), that Dr. Roberto Egidi, had not informed either Dr. Lucrezia Ungaro or Dr. Roberto Meneghini ( Office / Museum of the Imperial Fora) if this important discovery? Nearly fours years into the excavations at the pal. Madonna di Loreto site (2008-11), Dr. Egidi has done little to convey these important finding to his scholarly peers in Rome. Problematically the SSBAR in Rome responsible for the excavations in the Metro C archaeological surveys of the Imperial Fora (2007-2011, and the Temple of Peace (1999-2007), has done a very poor job of reporting on the archaeological findings, period! Several scholars in Rome, I spoke with said, that the Metro C archaeological excavations in the Fora, and the publications by Dr. Egidi, as so vague in details, and that these finding may never be published!

Thank you
Martin G. Conde
Washington DC, USA
29/04/2011

-Roma - Metro &#039;C&#039; indagini archeologiche 2008-10: Piazza Venezia (# S8/B1-B3 &amp; S8/B2) Palazzo di Madonna di Loreto / l &#039;, Ospedale dei Fornari (Metro C # S14/B1). Egidi R. &amp; M. Serlorenzi (12/2010).
http://www.flickr.com/photos/imperial_fora_of_rome/5341724268/in/set-72157618784453605</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Dott.ssa Orlandri, as for your comment: &#8220;&#8230;but a little bit more discretion and patience while the official publication is still forthcoming,&#8221; yes your right, but what surprised me the most about the news of the discovery or the inscriptions and other artifacts discovered at the site, and photographed between Jan. &#8211; Feb. 2011, I was surprised to learn from the scholars at the Museum of the Imperial Fora (e-mail personal communication in Feb. 2011), that Dr. Roberto Egidi, had not informed either Dr. Lucrezia Ungaro or Dr. Roberto Meneghini ( Office / Museum of the Imperial Fora) if this important discovery? Nearly fours years into the excavations at the pal. Madonna di Loreto site (2008-11), Dr. Egidi has done little to convey these important finding to his scholarly peers in Rome. Problematically the SSBAR in Rome responsible for the excavations in the Metro C archaeological surveys of the Imperial Fora (2007-2011, and the Temple of Peace (1999-2007), has done a very poor job of reporting on the archaeological findings, period! Several scholars in Rome, I spoke with said, that the Metro C archaeological excavations in the Fora, and the publications by Dr. Egidi, as so vague in details, and that these finding may never be published!</p>
<p>Thank you<br />
Martin G. Conde<br />
Washington DC, USA<br />
29/04/2011</p>
<p>-Roma &#8211; Metro &#8216;C&#8217; indagini archeologiche 2008-10: Piazza Venezia (# S8/B1-B3 &amp; S8/B2) Palazzo di Madonna di Loreto / l &#8216;, Ospedale dei Fornari (Metro C # S14/B1). Egidi R. &amp; M. Serlorenzi (12/2010).<br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/imperial_fora_of_rome/5341724268/in/set-72157618784453605" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/imperial_fora_of_rome/5341724268/in/set-72157618784453605</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CIEGL 2012 Berlin, Newsletter &amp; CFP by Filippo Canali De Rossi</title>
		<link>http://www.currentepigraphy.org/2011/02/18/ciegl-newsletter/comment-page-1/#comment-46099</link>
		<dc:creator>Filippo Canali De Rossi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 20:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.currentepigraphy.org/?p=920#comment-46099</guid>
		<description>I am disappointed. On such Congresses there used to be five full days of Congress (arrival on Sunday and departure on Saturday), and now there are only three (arrive on Monday and departure on Friday). There seem to be no expectation or request that the average researcher will produce a scholarly output especially for this Congress, as there will be no space for him to present it, let alone to publish it. I would like to know who and why selected these ten topics for panels. Is there a special epigraphic interest in harbours? Doesn&#039;t Christian epigraphy have her own Congresses?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am disappointed. On such Congresses there used to be five full days of Congress (arrival on Sunday and departure on Saturday), and now there are only three (arrive on Monday and departure on Friday). There seem to be no expectation or request that the average researcher will produce a scholarly output especially for this Congress, as there will be no space for him to present it, let alone to publish it. I would like to know who and why selected these ten topics for panels. Is there a special epigraphic interest in harbours? Doesn&#8217;t Christian epigraphy have her own Congresses?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some new inscriptions found in Rome by Silvia Orlandi</title>
		<link>http://www.currentepigraphy.org/2011/01/19/some-new-inscriptions-found-in-rome/comment-page-1/#comment-44720</link>
		<dc:creator>Silvia Orlandi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 06:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.currentepigraphy.org/?p=896#comment-44720</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s good to have fresh news on newly discovered inscriptions, but a little bit more discretion and patience while the official publication is still forthcoming would have been appreciated...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good to have fresh news on newly discovered inscriptions, but a little bit more discretion and patience while the official publication is still forthcoming would have been appreciated&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Practical Epigraphy Workshop, Oxford 12-14 April 2011 by Tweets that mention Current Epigraphy » Practical Epigraphy Workshop, Oxford 12-14 April 2011 -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.currentepigraphy.org/2011/02/15/practical-epigraphy-workshop-2/comment-page-1/#comment-42875</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Current Epigraphy » Practical Epigraphy Workshop, Oxford 12-14 April 2011 -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.currentepigraphy.org/?p=914#comment-42875</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Vincent Brown, researchnewsinla. researchnewsinla said: Classics Subject Centre Practical Epigraphy Workshop for University Lecturers/Postdoctoral staff (Current Epigraphy) http://bit.ly/gfHeG7 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Vincent Brown, researchnewsinla. researchnewsinla said: Classics Subject Centre Practical Epigraphy Workshop for University Lecturers/Postdoctoral staff (Current Epigraphy) <a href="http://bit.ly/gfHeG7" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/gfHeG7</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some new inscriptions found in Rome by Martin G. Conde, Wash. DC, USA</title>
		<link>http://www.currentepigraphy.org/2011/01/19/some-new-inscriptions-found-in-rome/comment-page-1/#comment-40752</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin G. Conde, Wash. DC, USA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 04:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.currentepigraphy.org/?p=896#comment-40752</guid>
		<description>- Update: Rome: the Metro C Archaeological Surveys: the Piazza Madonna di Loreto, (sector # S14/B1). The Discovery of New Inscriptions &amp; Architectural Elements of the Temple of Trajan? (January 20th, 2011).
http://www.flickr.com/photos/imperial_fora_of_rome/5374055767/

During the course of the recent archeological surveys conducted in the area of the former Piazza Madonna di Loreto, (sector #14 / B1) Italian archaeologists working under the direction of Dr. Roberto Egidi &amp; Dr. Mirella Serlorenzi (SSBAR) [n.1] may have discovered a new Trajanic inscription? This based upon a series of new photographs taken by Gianni De Dominicis, at the excavations site as of January 2 &amp; 17, 2011.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- Update: Rome: the Metro C Archaeological Surveys: the Piazza Madonna di Loreto, (sector # S14/B1). The Discovery of New Inscriptions &amp; Architectural Elements of the Temple of Trajan? (January 20th, 2011).<br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/imperial_fora_of_rome/5374055767/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/imperial_fora_of_rome/5374055767/</a></p>
<p>During the course of the recent archeological surveys conducted in the area of the former Piazza Madonna di Loreto, (sector #14 / B1) Italian archaeologists working under the direction of Dr. Roberto Egidi &amp; Dr. Mirella Serlorenzi (SSBAR) [n.1] may have discovered a new Trajanic inscription? This based upon a series of new photographs taken by Gianni De Dominicis, at the excavations site as of January 2 &amp; 17, 2011.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

